The Pros and Cons of Cell Phone Jammers


Cell phone jammers are devices that interfere with cell phone signals, thereby cutting off the ability to receive calls and messages. The military, law enforcement, and civilians use these tools. Although the Federal Communications Commission outlaws the use of cell phone jammers, the industry has fought to change the laws in recent years. Click here: for more details on jammers.
In the US, using a jammer is punishable by up to a year in jail. If the device is designed to block more than one frequency at a time, it is considered to be a denial of service attack. The FCC argued that this type of interference can lead to the loss of services and the theft of property, as well as other serious consequences.
Critics of the idea argue that money and control over new systems are driving the push for legalizing cell phone jammers. For example, in a recent report, the FCC found that several businesses were actively seeking to amend cell phone laws. One of the cases highlighted was the use of contraband cell phones in prisons, which led to a violent riot.
However, while some argue that it is criminal to jam a cell phone, there are also legal reasons for utilizing a jammer. One such example is if a cell phone is stolen and the owner is unable to locate it. A jammer could protect the owner's privacy by preventing the thief from calling anyone.
Some high-end models are tuned to specific frequencies, which can block the use of dual-mode and tri-mode phones. They are also powerful enough to interfere with other cell phone networks.
Law enforcement agencies often use these devices to prevent crime and limit communication during war and hostage situations. Jamming can also be a cost-effective solution, as it is a relatively inexpensive and easy device to set up. See page for more information on this topic 
A recent example of the actual use of a signal jammer in a public setting is the case of Dean Liptak, a science teacher at Pasco County, Florida school. After discovering that students were distracted by their cell phones during class, Liptak took action. He placed a jammer in the classroom to prevent distraction.
Although he claims it was only meant to prevent the distraction of students, he also maintains that his actions were not malicious. But when Verizon discovered Liptak's cell phone jamming efforts, the network provider argued that the jammer was causing the network to malfunction.
Other uses of signal jammers include blocking emergency signals, like a bomb threat or fire. These devices can be found in schools, theaters, and vehicles. And the FBI has been investigating their use.
According to the FCC, the Department of Justice and the National District Attorney Association have been lobbying for the use of jammers for a long time. Some state corrections officials have also been calling for federal legislation that would allow the use of cell phone jammers in jails.
While it is unclear how cell phone jammers will affect the FCC's ruling, some experts believe that the ban on mobile phone jammers will result in stronger signals sent out by other types of devices, such as landlines. That means the government may have more opportunities to snoop. If you probably want to get more enlightened on this topic, then click on this related post:

This website was created for free with Webme. Would you also like to have your own website?
Sign up for free